Looking for a little help on an H. Scherping Hammer double rifle. The chamber was cast and the dimensions are shown in the picture. The perplexing part is the length of the neck it is to short for 9,3x57R and to long for 9,3x62R. The rifle’s only marking is a crown over V proof mark. I understand this to be a proof added to already built or on hand rifle’s when the proof laws were issued. This leads me to believe the rifle pre-dates 1891 and was likely a black powder round.
After some more study of the chamber cast the should of the “bottle neck” is not very pronounced. I am thinking that maybe the riffle started life as a 9.3X48R and was rechambered to a 9.3X58R or 360 nitro express. It is possible that what I think is a shoulder is just remnants of the 9.3X48R. I know of German guns showing up in England after the war and rechambering to 360 would make sense for acquiring ammo there. The twist rate is around 1 turn in 30” so a light bullet is in order.
I am not versed enough in this era of cartridges to know what direction to go to figure this out. A 303 with a paper patched .357 bullet fire formed and performed well. However, it is clear that the case is to short. I am leaning toward taking a 9.3X72R and shortening it to match the chamber cast. Any insights or help in figuring this out is much appreciated.
After some more study of the chamber cast the should of the “bottle neck” is not very pronounced. I am thinking that maybe the riffle started life as a 9.3X48R and was rechambered to a 9.3X58R or 360 nitro express. It is possible that what I think is a shoulder is just remnants of the 9.3X48R. I know of German guns showing up in England after the war and rechambering to 360 would make sense for acquiring ammo there. The twist rate is around 1 turn in 30” so a light bullet is in order.
I am not versed enough in this era of cartridges to know what direction to go to figure this out. A 303 with a paper patched .357 bullet fire formed and performed well. However, it is clear that the case is to short. I am leaning toward taking a 9.3X72R and shortening it to match the chamber cast. Any insights or help in figuring this out is much appreciated.
Comment